What Shocked Me Most — and What Didn't
Before I walked into the bushmeat market in Tanzania, I thought I knew what to expect. I had read the articles, watched the documentaries, and heard the warnings. I was ready to be shocked. What I was not ready for was how complicated the feeling would be once I was actually standing there — how some things hit me harder than I imagined, and how other things, the ones I had braced myself for, turned out to feel strangely ordinary. This is the honest account of what shocked me most, and what did not.
I am writing this because travellers often judge a place before they arrive, based on a headline or a single photograph. The market taught me that shock is not always a reliable guide to understanding. Sometimes the most shocking thing is not what you see but what it means. And sometimes the thing you expected to horrify you is, for the people living with it every day, simply Tuesday morning.
What Genuinely Shocked Me
The first thing that shocked me was the scale of it. I had imagined a small, hidden trade, a few stalls tucked away in a corner. Instead, the market was open, busy, and unashamed. There were rows of stalls, piles of meat, and a steady flow of customers, all in broad daylight. It did not feel hidden at all. That openness shocked me more than any single item on sale, because it told me how normal this trade has become — how little fear there is of being caught, and how little enforcement there seems to be.
The second shock was the condition of the meat itself. I have been to markets all over the world, and I am used to the smell of fresh meat and fish. This was different. Meat sat in the tropical heat with no refrigeration, flies everywhere, blood pooling on the ground, and butchering happening in the open with no clean water in sight. As someone who has eaten street food in dozens of countries, I am not easily put off — but this was a different level of risk, and it was not hard to imagine how disease could spread from a place like this. The health danger was not an abstract idea from a report. It was right in front of me, and it was impossible to ignore.
What Turned Out to Be Ordinary
What did not shock me, surprisingly, was the people. I had braced myself for something sinister, but the traders were ordinary people doing an ordinary day's work — chatting with customers, weighing meat, counting money, joking with each other. The buyers were families shopping for dinner. Children ran between the stalls. There was nothing theatrical or secretive about it, and that ordinariness was itself a lesson. The trade does not survive because of a few shadowy criminals. It survives because it is woven into everyday life, into diets, incomes, and traditions that go back generations.
The animals on sale also surprised me in an unexpected way. Some of the meat was from animals I recognised and some from animals I did not, but I had expected to be confronted with creatures I would instantly know were endangered, and the reality was messier. Much of what was sold was common game, hunted for food, and the line between legal hunting and illegal poaching was not something I could see with my own eyes. That does not make the trade harmless — far from it — but it reminded me that the market cannot be understood from a single photograph. It needs context, and context is the one thing shock never gives you.
What the Shock Taught Me About My Own Judgements
The market forced me to look at my own reactions honestly. I come from Pakistan, where I have seen markets that would shock a visitor from Europe — live chickens, open butchery, and smells that take getting used to. What feels normal depends entirely on where you grew up. A traveller from a country with supermarkets and cold chains will find a Tanzanian market shocking, just as a Tanzanian visitor might find a Western factory farm shocking. Shock is often just the feeling of encountering a different normal.
That does not mean everything is relative and nothing matters. The wildlife and health risks in the bushmeat trade are real, and they are not a matter of opinion. But I learned to separate my gut reaction — the smell, the flies, the strangeness — from the real questions underneath: which species are threatened, who profits, who has alternatives, and what would actually help. The first kind of shock is about me. The second kind is about the place. A good traveller learns to tell the difference, and to act on the second kind rather than just performing the first.
Carrying the Story Home Honestly
When I left the market, I knew I had a responsibility to tell the story honestly. That means not using the most graphic photo I took just to get clicks, and not writing as if I had discovered some secret horror that nobody in Tanzania knows about. The people of Tanzania know this market. Conservationists in Tanzania know it too, and many of them are working hard — often with very little money — to give hunters and traders other ways to earn a living.
The honest version of the story is this: I was shocked by the scale of the trade and the health risks I saw, and I was not shocked by the ordinariness of the people or the everyday nature of the market. Both of those truths matter. If we only tell the shocking part, we turn a complicated problem into a horror show and learn nothing. If we only tell the ordinary part, we excuse a trade that is harming wildlife and endangering health. The real story is in the middle, and it is the only version worth carrying home.
I went to that market expecting to be shocked, and I was — just not in the way I expected. The shock that stayed with me was not the sight of the meat or the smell of the stalls. It was the realisation that a problem this big can look so normal, and that normal is the hardest thing in the world to change.




















